home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: itschere@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de
- Subject: Re: MiNT 1.09: some protection for biosfs
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 93 13:54:09 MET
- In-Reply-To: <9311231009.AA01158@lamothe.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>; from "Andreas Schwab" at Nov 23, 93 11:09:50 am
-
- Andreas Schwab,
-
- > Most of the function of biosfs that change it should only be allowed
- > by root, IMHO. This patch adds checks to bios_remove, bios_rename,
- > bios_fscntl and bios_symlink. Additionally i have added a check for
- > existence of the new name in bios_rename.
-
- These will hopefully be superseeded by the more general ideas I'm trying
- to implement the last days.
-
- Since response was quite poor, I think I'm going to implement the
- datime method plus _removing_ the possibility to access the bios_file
- through (f->fc.index) for security reasons. The biosfs itself doesn't
- use it as such and it was never documented anyway so what should speak
- against it?
-
- Device drivers which are responsible for more than one entry can still
- find out the correct one by using the (f->fc.aux) field.
-
- TeSche
- --
- PS: If the above written looks weird, than that's because it probably IS.
- WhoDunnIt: Torsten Scherer (Schiller, TeSche...)
- Technical Faculty, University of Bielefeld, Germany (52'5"N 8'35"E)
- EMail: itschere@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de / tesche@dave.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de
-